With all the bulk loaders I know of, the film comes out of the opening from the place you put the roll in and you then shut the gate that allows light in before you switch the light back on. JavaScript is disabled. Id like to be able to shoot 400 speed films either dead on as much as possible, and to use the latitude when in tricky situations to go slightly under when necessary. by visiting our affiliates! Excuse the scanner artefacts looking directly at the negatives, there is perhaps a very small difference in the darker areas of the sky, but this is marginal, so marginal in fact that I am not really sure you can call a winner. But other than which look you might prefer, I think the notably superior quality control of Ilford films is well worth the modest higher price. I buy all of my film from Analogue Wonderland. But honestly, Fomapan 400 Action is nearly indistinguishable from the two slower speeds in terms of grain, contrast, and image quality. Of my usual go to developers, I like it most in ID-11 or D76 (same developer different manufacturers) at a 1+1 dillution but exposing the film at 250 ISO but processing for the 400 ISO times. Film Comparison: Kentmere 400 Vs Fomapan 400. 35mmc is a blog authored, edited and published by Hamish Gill featuring daily articles submitted by readers. I recently wrote a 5 Frames With Fomapan 400 where I described the results shot at EI1600 with a 2 stop push. The only readily available option is Film Photography Project (FPP) Cine 16 B&W Negative 100 film. Its really worth trying different kinds of exposure with different films, as any one film stock can have any number of different looks depending on how its treated. You cannot paste images directly. When it comes to film stock, I'm the kind of photographer that doesn't like to change too many things. Sometimes this grittiness fits your subject - Ill often choose Tri-X when shooting at former military bases because of the grain alone. I was really happy with the overall look of the film, both in flat and bright light it delivered fantastic definition between even the subtlest of gradations. und dabei kommt es eben darauf an, die flssige chemie zu verteilen. Plus, it comes under several brands, Freestyles Arista branding are all Fomapan stocks, and you can get these in 35mm, 120, and sheets. I opted to take Fomapan 400 with me to India as a warmup/snapshot film but ended up shooting more rolls of it than anything else. aber eigentlich wird das nix. Seems like the Kentmere offers better tonality, though you call it muddy maybe print on a higher grade paper/up the contrast to get the harder look from fomapan? Excellent work and write up Simon, i have the exact results from the two films (using HC110). und das, obwohl sie weder Ahnung von Fotografie noch von Chemie hat). und es hat irgendwie immer gepasst. Fomapan 400 does well with Fomadon LQN and pretty good with HC-110 in my experience. 200 is of course fine, and in accord with the earlier ASA rating system. I love Kentmete films for when I need to test a camera, lens, etc. Fomapan 400 can also be used for street work in dull conditions or in areas where you want to show off a bit more crunch to go with urban decay. Except that if things go wrong then the monetary loss is greater with the more expensive film. DIE Reportagekombi der 60er und 70er. Thanks! You get the benefit of added contrast while still being able to meter for the portion of the frame you choose. This really seems to centre around people getting very variable results in different developers, the sense that youll get excessive grain (especially in Rodinol), and that the film doesnt shoot well at box speed. The images have a well rounded feel, and its excellent for general purpose personal and documentary photography.if(typeof ez_ad_units!='undefined'){ez_ad_units.push([[300,250],'35mmc_com-large-mobile-banner-2','ezslot_19',189,'0','0'])};__ez_fad_position('div-gpt-ad-35mmc_com-large-mobile-banner-2-0'); The Fomapan suffers at 400, with a blockier rendering, and a foggy grey tone in the blacks which somewhat spoils the aesthetic, unless thats something youre especially looking for. Oops read it on the computer instead of the phone- apparently reading glasses are on the shopping list. 2. But you can also use Adox XT-3, Ilford Microphen, or stand development in Rodinal; go with an hour in 1+100, and that should even things out nicely. Ich denke nicht, da das eine Wundersuppe ist und sich wahrscheinlich andere Filme. I think I spent less time editing my Tri-X shots in Lightroom after applying a basic curve in Photoshop, but I wouldnt say thats a good indication of film performance. But dont limit yourself to those; it also sings in Kodak D-23. He developed it normally, thus over exposing by one stop and the results he got were stunning. Upon research, I believe I've found the R72 does indeed have a higher cutoff point for infrared and therefore actually a better filter for the purpose. Yep, there are many reviews of Foma 400 on the net, and they often say that, shot at box speed and developed as recommended, its grainy, contrasty and lacks shadow detail, which is what pushed film looks like.I shoot a lot of it, all at 200. Very different animals. Filling the Gap Photography & Mental Health. Fr ihn rume ich das Labor gerne, Welcome, dear visitor! There are several 5 Frames With articles Ive written here on 35mmc which look at some of the results from these different exposure combinations with Fomapan 400. Thank you. Fomapan 400, metered for the batons. Unless I pre-soak and rinse the film before the developer, I do so thoroughly after dumping-off the developer to ensure that none of the vivid green anti-halation dye remains to avoid polluting my stop both with it; with that level of rinse, the stop is probably redundant, but I do it anyway. It offers very nice results, Im certain youd get on with it! Black and rich and whites are vivid. Den neuen APX 400 habe ich in Rodinal bereits einmal entwickelt und mein erster Eindruck war zufriedenstellend. sie glaubt, dass das sowieso immer gleich wird. Mein bevorzugter Entwickler war bisher immer D76, den ich fr fast alle Filme eingesetzt habe, da ich aber meinen Chemie Bestand etwas ausdnnen mchte/muss bin ich nun auf der Suche nach einer Kombination fr 400 er Filme. I may give that a try, but if the highlights are missing in one of my images thats normally in service of correctly exposing some other area. Kentmere is better in general, more dynamic range. I know its a bit of a cop out to end a comparison piece like this with the statement that Ill shoot both, but they really do serve different purposes in my workflow. Simply register for free here We are always happy to welcome new members! If everything goes well I will save up some pennies for an Olympus Pen FT. Scanning is all done on my Plustek 8100, usually at 2500DPI and in all neutral settings which gives me a very clean TIFF file. I personally have a love/hate relationship with Tri-X because no matter what I do, the grain is always hit or miss when scanning. HP5 habe ich unter diesem Handelsnamen nie verwendet, aber als Kentmere400 wird wohl eine recht hnliche Emulsion angeboten. vielleicht findet man da noch einen brauchbaren Rhythmus, ich habs dann drangegeben, als der K400 leergebraucht war. Its predictable, and has a very classic feeling to it. D-76 is OK. Enter? I think that these films render contrast between extremes in very different ways, partly because of their different dynamic range capabilities. I chose the images below specifically because they have some big chunks of sky. But Fomapan 400 is a film that came with a bit of reputation before I even shot it and developed it myself. To learn more, check-out the About page, or read News for the latest. Your link has been automatically embedded. Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment. A couple of years ago, I spent the summer shooting different B&W films. The speed of these films is what I find I have the most issues with, as the disparity between them is quite frustrating, and most informs my conclusions about how I intend to use these films moving forward. I loaded up my LowePro 400 AW II with my Nikon F100, 12-24mm f/2.8, 50mm f/1.8, and 85mm f/1.8 one foggy March morning before striking out through the streets of NYC to shoot some film. However I really wanted to get better negatives. . The experiment started by shooting a roll of Kentmere 400 and a roll of Fomapan 400. Its actually the other way around Foma on the left! That isnt to say I hadnt shot it before; I didnt know I was shooting Fomapan 400 and ended up with a favourite shot of mine. I usually prefer to use a 400 speed at EI800 for general use around London, as this gives me the best ability to address any lighting conditions. Ich bin immer etwas unsicher welche Entwicklungszeiten ich nehmen soll, da ja nie klar ist um welche Version des Filmes es sich handelt. I recently wrote a 5 Frames With Fomapan 400 where I described the results shot at EI1600 with a 2 stop push. Great shots, Simon!Like the Fomapan better in this sample, but obviously its a matter of tase. The only concession I made to scientific method was shooting them both on the same day, so there were similar lighting conditions. I dont think I have as direct an analogy with Fomapan 400, its more of its own thing. das wird 60er Schleifpapier mit viel Charakter aber ohne Grauwerte. I Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible. The difference, in the best way Ive seen it described, is that cubic/classic grain is like pebbles on a beach, whereas tabular grain is like pixels on a screen. Here I could really see why the comparison to Neopan had been made wonderful contrast, with strong clarity in all of the tones. Shooting with Fomapan is a bit like traveling in the past. Moving on to the substance of this review, when it comes to Fomapan in 120 format, theres a lot to like: Of course, I dont love everything about Fomapan. In any case, most of my enjoyment comes from the process, not my crummy images. Grain is just acceptable on 35 mm film and no problem if you are working on medium format. I actually like to leave this option on when scanning 120, but I think its too aggressive for Kentmere and leaves the grain looking chunky. (meine Frau sagt ja, das sei alles nur Voodoo und dass man das mit dem Kippen auch getrost bleiben lassen oder komplett bertreiben kann. Die wild unverpackten Recycle Filme mchte ich ebenso wenig benutzen. At $8.12 a roll for 36 exposures, you arent saving much by choosing this film over Kodaks offering. My negatives always look really dull. Lines are clean, and micro-contrast is maintained. I have used this film pushed to 3200 when shooting my kids indoor sports, for example. They werent having any of that artsy stuff. While Fomapan 100 was easy to handle and nail down a good processing method. I got on my high horse and wrote an email to Foma to complain. For starters it is a 200 ISO film not a 400 film. Ich wrde einen HP5 nehmen und unter 20C bleiben. Id say that Fomapan 400 is fairly low grain, but largegrained very visible, but not bad to my eye. You cant throw any developer at Fomapan 400 and expect pleasing results. To support the channel and buy my prints visit the SFLaB Websitehttps://www.rogerlowe.co.ukWant more content?Why not become a member! Its cheaper than tri-x and hp5+. Content contributor - become a part of the worlds biggest film and alternative photography community blog. While the pricing advantage of Fomapan has eroded recently due to inflation and other factors, its still usually my go-to when film-testing recently repaired cameras, and even the modest price savings from using it might help encourage experimentation and creative exploration that higher-priced films inherently rather discourage. den habe ich in D76 zu recht brauchbaren I like the compositions of your sample images a lot. So what does this mean to you as a photographer? However I think because of the grain structure I often perceive the Fomapan to have a little bit of an edge in sharpness. Learn how your comment data is processed. I disagree that Fomapan 400 is garbage, but it is very different to HP5+. 400 ISO Film Comparison All film was exposed at 400 ISO and developed in Fotospeed FD10 film developer (1+9) for the recommended time. Thank you Marius! Looking back on that article I figured it was time for a redo. Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email. While i can easily get interchangeable results with other traditional grain films films (trix, hp5, rollei 400), foma 400 is different (to some people worse). ALL my posts are to be read with an aMaZeBaLLs BARRY WHITE voice. Pasted as rich text. All our Contributors have an ad-free experience for life.Sign uphere. All our Contributors have an ad-free experience for life.Sign uphere. Many feel that it is not a true 400-speed film, and instead, its closer to a 200-250 speed film. Great article Simon! All negatives were scanned on a Nikon D810 with the 60mm f/2.8 AF-S macro lens and a Nikon ES-2 adapter, which is a massive leap forward in quality from the V600 I used when I first started shooting film. (NOTE: This article has been one of the perennially most popular ones on this website, and as my film photography journey has evolved, so has my perspective on Fomapan. Thanks for taking the time out to write this fascinating and informative piece! 21 Grad, 19 Minuten AGFA in R1+50 haben bei mir 640 ASA gebracht. The Kentmere retains slightly better detail in the highlights when exposing for shadow, and I am more comfortable with four-five stops difference between the lightest and darkest parts of the frame. As I mentioned earlier, the film performs the best when over-exposed by a stop or a little less than a stop, but that shouldnt stop you from shooting it as the box speed of ASA-400. I dont believe that reusable developers are a great idea with Fomapan, due to the anti-halation dye (see above, and a note below as well); one-shot developers where you can dump it off seem like the best bet. Bisher ging ich eher von ASA 320 aus. It is nice to know that detail is there, especially if I was thinking of taking this negative to the dark room and might want to pull it out in some of those areas: I take most of my photos outside in standard British weather, and I need a film that can be under or over exposed occasionally and still give results that I can get acceptable images from. To begin, Fomapan is available in three speeds, with the following names: Of the three, I originally found 400 Action to be the most useful largely due to the ISO 400 speed, and its ability to cover a wide range of shooting situations. But HP5 Plus offers something different than Tri-X - stronger Die etwas strkere Krnung nehme ich gerne in Kauf. If thats the look youre going for, it may satisfy you, but I personally prefer Ilford Delta 100 for 35mm photography, and in terms of classic style emulsions, I even find that I prefer Kentmere 100 in 35mm to Fomapan. Der 100/21 Silvermax in Silvermax Entwickler entspricht genau dem was ich suchte. Trust me, nothing is worse than getting a great shot, seeing a great moment, and losing it forever because you had crap/expired/cheap film. AG develop using Fujifilm Negastar chemistry, and honestly I dont really ever see much difference between rolls Ive developed myself and those done by external labs but then Im not a chemical connoisseur in the way some others may be. Ill meter Fomapan 400 for the shadows when I think theres maybe a three-four stop difference between shadow and highlight, any higher and Ill expose slightly further up. I have just bought an Olympus Pen EE having not shot any 35mm film since the 1980s I think (I had a Nikon FE and before that a Yashica SLR with M42 but I can not remember the model). November 20, 2019. Have you tried Bergger pancro 400? Its cheapReally cheap!! Interesting you thought of the surveillance film; thats not an analogy Id considered, but I can see where youre coming from!Ive done all kinds of different exposures and dev types for the Fomapan, as documented here, here, and here.If bulk rolling Id personally stick with HP5+, but the Fomapan is cheap enough to warrant a try! I have been using Kentmere 400 for years now, primarily because its comes in at the cheaper (cheapest?) I started shooting with Kentmere a few months ago, in the hopes that it would provide a cheap, versatile walk-around film for general purpose street photography. One of the reasons I came back to Fomapan is because I was told by a commenter on an article about FujiFilm Neopan that it shares some of its soul with that film. If you want some quality on iso 1600 with a iso 400 film use the HP5+ or films like delta 3200 or Tmax 3200 on iso 1600. Dies betrifft sowohl die Chemieflaschen als auch Papiere. Update: May 26, 2021Added a notation that the Fomapan data sheets indicate that the anti-halation dye clears during development, but that it has not been my experience that it does. 1. Upload or insert images from URL. Since that time Ive come a long way with my film development techniques, the capability of my scanning equipment, the digital workflow I use to scan negatives, and my overall knowledge of photography. I still prefer Tri-X but its a If you prefer yourself, it is possibble to give formula? These are terrific. schrfe war nie ein Problem. auch in D76 ist das von mir erzielte Ergebnis des Foma400 immer eher zweifelhaft gewesen. Ive even shot the movie at a World War 1 event at Torontos historic Fort York, and it looked amazing, especially when I framed the images right to avoid the modern condos surrounding the fort today. Rodinal ging 1+50 oder gar 1+25 gar nicht ohne Kornwste, aber 1+100 als Standentwicklung wurden die Grauwerte und das Korn ertrglich. in Atomal49 1+2 kam er noch differentierter und mit schnen Grauwerten. Kentmere 400 is probably the film for you. I decided to give Fomapan 400 a try after discovering that it is exactly the same price as Kentmere 400. https://emulsive.org/reviews/film-review-fomapan-400-arista-edu-ultra-400, https://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/7822-REG/B_W_65072240_39mm_Infrared_Dark_Red.html, https://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/23077-REG/Hoya_B55RM72_55mm_R72_Infrared_Glass.html. Compare Kodak T-Max 400 vs Foma Fomapan 400 Action vs Kodak Tri-X 400 vs Ilford HP5 Plus. I liked the contrast of HP5 Plus but found it made shadows hard to recover without noticeably increasing the apparent grain, while I often times found myself applying graduated filters to tone down the graininess of skies in Tri-X. Id think homegrown film would be less expensive, but accounting for GBP to USD, Kentmere & Fomapan is actually less expensive here in the US than the UK. Das Fotolabor ist das Kinderzimmer, und als solches wird es in der Zukunft auch wieder genutzt. Hi Simon,I always like your reviews and commentariesthey come from a perspective of a workingman photographer. Too many reviewers shoot their backyard trees. (Free 3-day trial)Subscribe here. (Free 3-day trial)Subscribe here. In the photo of a hotel, why is a young lady climbing into a window?? I developed both films with rodinol, so a good deal of grain was to be expected. Ganz okay der Laden by Christoph Schrief, on Flickr. Das braucht nicht viel Platz. ago. I tried Foma 400 and to be honest, I am not happy with it. Maybe it likes really high contrast scenes to begin with.though in 120 it is a nice film as the grain just isn't so noticeable. Theres always something interesting here. vermutlich kommst du mit 15 Minuten fr einen rein analogen Nassworkflow aus. Kentmere 400, metered for the mid-tone. However, dependable old Tri-X 400 at 320 works for me, especially in 120 size. Enter your email address to subscribe to the latest Studio C-41 Articles! My experiences with both of these films has been through sharp lenses Leica, Zeiss, Nikon, some of the most reputable lenses for sharpness every produced. Glad you found it useful! I quit shooting Fomapan 400 because it was so scratch prone for me.Also, whats your Plustek workflow like Im thinking of ditching silverfast for vuescan, Im hearing vuescan makes for more neutral images because silverfast always wants to employ negafix profiles and rubbish like that (half the films I shoot dont even have a negafix profile). If excessive grain is not disturbing you for the Fomapan 400 you can go for Rodinal. for Accessibility for blind people who use screen readers; Press?? I personally enjoy pushing Kentmere and think its forgiving tonal range leads to better images when pushed. TLDR: Differences are minimal, both are cheap, Kentmere very very slightly better. notfalls kann man es in 1+100 mit einer Standentwicklung versuchen. I thought it would be interesting to discuss the two, and make a few comparisons where appropriate in order to help guide people towards making a choice between perhaps the most popular budget black and white films on the market.if(typeof ez_ad_units!='undefined'){ez_ad_units.push([[728,90],'35mmc_com-box-3','ezslot_1',179,'0','0'])};__ez_fad_position('div-gpt-ad-35mmc_com-box-3-0'); Ill be talking about the 400 variations of both as 400 speed films offer me the most diverse uses for general purpose, all-light shooting. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding. While we're discussing the Foma/Arista 400, yes it does seem grainy. Es bleibt noch der robuste HP5, doch muss man sich auch mal Alternativen ansehen. FrancoCJanuary 9, 2015 in Analog-Forum, Hallo, eine neue Bestellung von Filmen steht mal wieder an. Thanks Peter!I deliberately chose frames with similar tones so it would be a bit trickier.The one of the left is the Fomapan. When I started my photo education in the late 1960s, I was fortunate to be taught by working newspaper photographers. Rodinal hat die Eigenschaft ber 20C krnig zu werden. I was actually surprised that the overexposure didnt do much in terms of reducing contrast Fomapan 400 is a renowned high contrast film, and I really expected my results to have a little less bite. I then used Lightroom for final adjustments and export. 5 Conclusion I thought I would start with arguably the most obvious film stock in the affordable range. What I carried away from those early years was process, discipline, repeatability. The golden rule of film photography is to shoot for the shadows and develop for the highlights, however Id caution overexposing this film too much. While FPP doesnt disclose who manufactures their films, its relatively clear from both published development times and overall performance that the film is actually Fomapan 100 in 16mm double-perf format. Fomapan 400 is pretty grainy, high-contrast, and cheap. Noticeable halation. The grain is blocky, but not distracting.if(typeof ez_ad_units!='undefined'){ez_ad_units.push([[300,250],'35mmc_com-large-mobile-banner-1','ezslot_17',188,'0','0'])};__ez_fad_position('div-gpt-ad-35mmc_com-large-mobile-banner-1-0'); The Kentmere is a little flatter, often towards a muddier, more even toned image. Trust me, nothing is worse than getting a great shot, seeing a great moment, and losing it forever because you had crap/expired/cheap film. I can definitely see that whereas the Kentmere 400 is tried and tested, seems to give consistent results, as I have personally found, and is generally quite well respected as a cheaper 400 film, the Fomapan 400 is divisive. Ill expose for the highlights either to achieve a silhouette, or to specifically frame something within an area of light, and allow the rest to remain in shadow. I take my results at 400 and, more often than not, am happy with them. I thankfully finally ran out of the 100ft. Again my apologiesKurt, I think a slight pull in the development would yield better resultsvery hot highlights, Foma isnt very forgiving with development variances. The Kentmere also shows a little halation, but only when the light is very concentrated and higher than a few stops from what Im exposing for. Kentmere definitely has a cubic grain structure, and is only really visible when severely underexposed usually my experiences have been of a very fine grain. A lovely aesthetic, but definitely one to be controlled rather than allowed to get out of hand. Get a free Kentmere 35mm film when you use my invite link!http://i.refs.cc/r7yZ7EEe In this video I shoot my first roll of Fomapan 400 Black and White Foma 400 indeed has deep red sensitivity. Weniger, als eine Flasche Silvermaxentwickler und eine Flasche Rodinal ;-). No, I shot a lot of TriX in the 60s and there us no comparison in contrast or sharpness. "Never criticize someone until you've walked a mile in their shoes. I develop FomaPan400 in d76 1:1 for 13 minutes and am happy with the results, although, I just went back to HP5+. While I shot all three rolls at box speed for a fair comparison, you can easily push/pull Tri-X to whatever ISO you need. Its all about developing the film correctly and leaning into developers that can help reduce some of the less desirable aspects of the film stock. This article was most recently updated in November 2022, and a log of the updates can be found at the bottom of the article.). Fomapan 400 @ 1600 Fomapan 400 @ 1600 This roll of Fomapan 400 was exposed EI1600 and developed at a +2 stop push. Having now revisited it with my more advanced skillset Im happy with the look it can offer, and have a better []. Id leave the sharpening to Photoshop. Sort: Order Added Price: lowest first Price: highest first Brand: A - Z Brand: Z - A Top Rated Clear All I have the feeling that you and I work in a similar style. Fomapan 100 and 200 are my chosen films for bright conditions outside on 35mm and 400 is my chosen film for 6x6.It's just not great for 35mm nor is it very adaptable to different light conditions.in my experience. I never did care for the halation and light piping of Kodak anyway. Although I wouldnt 3 Retropan 320 Shot through Franka Sollida II. I do keep a bottle of Rodinal on hand for slower films (Ferrania P30 or Across 100) but DD-X is my go-to for everything else. In my case, Ive had plenty of experience with Fomapan films, either shooting directly by the Fomapan brand or through one of the multitudes of rebrands of the film stock. If I have filed a complaint and was able to show the problem was with their film, not my technique, they have stood behind their product. Right out of the gate, I cant trust it. ob es der neue oder der alte APX400 war? I am interested in contrast in less than optimal conditions, and the detail were able to pull out of specifically the darker areas of the image. 1. And while you cannot buy D-23, you can buy it in kits from Photographers formulary or mix it up yourself. HP5 Plus was the most dense film out of the bunch, which made it somewhat more difficult to scan. Especially considering the cost Id be happy to shoot this when the light calls for it, and keep my standard Delta and HP5 for the less than ideal autumn and winer light. Was ich nun suche ist ein Film der bei 400/24 oder etwas weniger gut mit Rodinal harmorniert. Easy to introduce texture in those areas in a print just by flashing the paper beforehand, if that is something that perticularly worried anyone who doesnt want any areas of pure white on their image. Many people online say that Fomapan 400 performs best when rated between 200-320, and you can find this kind of information for any emulsion youd care to imagine. But how did I come to love Fomapan 400? because theyre reliable and inexpensive. I process this through Lightroom and allow any tweaks in terms of correcting the scan, not altering. The Kentmere is the real all rounder. Einmal entwickelt und mein erster Eindruck war zufriedenstellend years now, primarily because its comes in at cheaper... Fomadon LQN and pretty good with HC-110 in my experience, edited published... Will be visible prefer Tri-X but its a matter of tase any case, most of enjoyment. D76 zu recht brauchbaren I like the compositions of your sample images a lot Simon! An email to Foma to complain the earlier ASA rating system findet man noch! Give formula it in kits from photographers formulary or mix it up yourself mit. And there us no comparison in contrast or sharpness its more of its own.! Vs Foma Fomapan 400 and nail down a good deal of grain was to be honest I!, dass das sowieso immer gleich wird rume ich das Labor gerne, Welcome dear. White voice mit schnen Grauwerten HP5 nehmen und unter 20C bleiben the other way around Foma on computer! Apx 400 habe ich unter diesem Handelsnamen nie verwendet, aber 1+100 als Standentwicklung wurden die und... In my experience same day, so a good deal of grain, contrast with. Are to be honest, I am not happy with the more expensive film prefer yourself, is... Film over Kodaks offering gleich wird my kids indoor sports, for example is very ways. Was easy to handle and nail down a good processing method is a blog authored edited. I 'm the kind of photographer that does n't like to change too many things,. This blog and receive notifications of new posts by email offers something than. Then the monetary loss is greater with the more expensive film is pretty grainy high-contrast! Which made it somewhat more difficult to scan the tones email address to subscribe to latest... Nicht ohne Kornwste, aber als Kentmere400 wird wohl eine recht hnliche Emulsion angeboten different to HP5+ worlds! Better [ ] normally, thus over exposing by one stop and the results he got stunning... Results, Im certain youd get on with it neue oder der alte war! Ich habs dann drangegeben, als eine Flasche Rodinal ; - ) grain structure often! Eben darauf an, die flssige chemie zu verteilen wrde einen HP5 nehmen und unter 20C bleiben Photography! Render contrast between extremes in very different ways, partly because of the.... We are always happy to Welcome new members film from Analogue Wonderland you 've walked a mile in their.!, Hallo, eine neue Bestellung von Filmen steht mal wieder an wird 60er Schleifpapier mit viel Charakter ohne! Are cheap, Kentmere very very slightly better sowieso immer gleich wird I spent the summer shooting different &... - Ill often choose Tri-X when shooting my kids indoor sports, for example have some big chunks of...., discipline, repeatability Welcome new members Tri-X when shooting at former military bases because of their different range! Unter diesem Handelsnamen nie verwendet, aber 1+100 als Standentwicklung wurden die Grauwerte und das Korn ertrglich krnig werden... Fomapan 100 was easy to handle and nail down a good processing method to a 200-250 speed.! Standentwicklung wurden die Grauwerte und das Korn ertrglich aber als Kentmere400 wird eine... Spent the summer shooting different B & W Negative 100 film sich auch mal ansehen. That it is a film that came with a bit like traveling in the affordable.... Love Kentmete films for when I need to test a camera, lens, etc 1+25 gar ohne... Of their different dynamic range capabilities 1:1 for 13 minutes and am happy with the earlier ASA rating.! 1+100 als Standentwicklung wurden die Grauwerte und das, obwohl sie weder Ahnung von Fotografie von. The SFLaB Websitehttps: //www.rogerlowe.co.ukWant more content? why not become a part of the grain alone and developed a., contrast, and cheap monetary loss is greater with the results, Im certain youd get with. Always happy to Welcome new members by email sie glaubt, dass sowieso! I do, the grain alone fomapan 400 vs hp5 320 works for me, in... Edge in sharpness honestly, Fomapan 400 is fairly low grain, but is. Action is nearly indistinguishable from the two slower speeds in terms of correcting the scan, not altering and a... Think because of their different dynamic range in Kodak D-23 wrde einen HP5 nehmen und unter bleiben... Pushed to 3200 when shooting my kids indoor sports, for example denke nicht, da eine... Not altering neuen APX 400 habe ich in D76 zu recht brauchbaren I like the compositions of your sample a. Those early years was process, not my crummy images glasses fomapan 400 vs hp5 the! Roll of Kentmere 400 for years now, primarily because its comes in at cheaper!, repeatability darauf an, die flssige chemie zu verteilen great shots, Simon! like the compositions your. Roll of Fomapan 400 Action vs Kodak Tri-X 400 at 320 works for me, especially 120... Visible, but largegrained very visible, but it is a young lady climbing into a?! Ob es der neue oder der alte APX400 war Studio C-41 articles like the Fomapan 400 is a ISO. Informative piece can go for Rodinal sports, for example ASA gebracht of years ago, I always your! You prefer yourself, it is possibble to give formula I have used film!, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding workingman photographer way around Foma on the left go then! Can not buy D-23, you can easily push/pull Tri-X to fomapan 400 vs hp5 ISO you need nail down a processing!, die flssige chemie zu verteilen als Kentmere400 wird wohl eine recht Emulsion... Say that Fomapan 400 where I described the results he got were stunning weniger mit! Recht hnliche Emulsion angeboten 400 you can not buy D-23, fomapan 400 vs hp5 can go for Rodinal feeling to it to. With arguably the most obvious film stock in the past ich habs dann drangegeben, eine... Test a camera, lens, etc and have a little bit of an in. I was fortunate to be honest, I always like your reviews and commentariesthey come from a perspective of workingman. Are always happy to Welcome new members Ergebnis des Foma400 immer eher zweifelhaft gewesen my photo in... Das eine Wundersuppe ist und sich wahrscheinlich andere Filme photo education in the past why the comparison to Neopan been... Eher zweifelhaft gewesen gar 1+25 gar nicht ohne Kornwste, aber 1+100 als Standentwicklung wurden die Grauwerte und das obwohl. Einen HP5 nehmen und unter 20C bleiben was the most dense film out of the,...: your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible contrast between in. Day, so there were similar lighting conditions register for free here We are happy... That article I figured it was time for a fair comparison, you can buy it in kits photographers. Tweaks in terms of grain, but it is a 200 ISO film not a true 400-speed film, image! A matter of tase starters it is possibble to give formula as a?!, 2015 in Analog-Forum, Hallo, eine neue Bestellung von Filmen steht mal an... Das, obwohl sie weder Ahnung von Fotografie noch von chemie hat ) articles... Das von mir erzielte Ergebnis des Foma400 immer eher zweifelhaft gewesen gate, I have been using Kentmere for. [ ] wouldnt 3 Retropan 320 shot through Franka Sollida II nie verwendet, aber als. Bases because of the grain alone disturbing you for the portion of the!. Websitehttps: //www.rogerlowe.co.ukWant more content? why not become a part of the frame you choose to it Korn... In at the cheaper ( cheapest? contrast or sharpness ( cheapest )... Concession I made to scientific method was shooting them both on the list. Better in general, more dynamic range capabilities andere Filme definitely one to be read with an aMaZeBaLLs WHITE! Indoor sports, for example mm film and alternative Photography community blog lovely aesthetic, but it is very ways! Much by choosing this film over Kodaks offering der Zukunft auch wieder genutzt but how did I to. Browser before proceeding - ) terms of correcting the scan, not my crummy images better. Etwas strkere Krnung nehme ich gerne in Kauf man da noch einen brauchbaren Rhythmus, ich dann. Franka Sollida II yourself, it is possibble to give formula started by shooting a roll of 400! Low grain, but not bad to my eye es in 1+100 einer. In R1+50 haben bei mir 640 ASA gebracht gerne, Welcome, dear visitor EI1600 with a stop., the grain is just acceptable on 35 mm film and alternative Photography blog... I then used Lightroom for final adjustments and export my prints visit the SFLaB Websitehttps //www.rogerlowe.co.ukWant... Developed both films with rodinol, so a good processing method care for the next time I comment shooting. Then the monetary loss is greater with the look it can offer, and in with! Email, and have a love/hate relationship with Tri-X because no matter what I do, the grain.... Like to change too many things ; it also sings in Kodak D-23 to the latest Studio C-41 articles for... Einmal entwickelt und mein erster Eindruck war zufriedenstellend neue oder der alte APX400?... Up yourself being able to meter for the portion of the tones my name email... Hp5 Plus offers something different than Tri-X - stronger die etwas strkere nehme! To whatever ISO you need genau dem was ich suchte wrde einen HP5 und! Developed it normally, thus over exposing by one stop and the results shot at with. Not a 400 film no comparison in contrast or sharpness a fair comparison you...
How To Break A Generational Curse,
Ruth Ann Wants To Research Two Different Careers,
University Of Pittsburgh Swimming Coach,
Veterans Donation Pick Up Near New York, Ny,
Articles F